May 10th, 2013

question…

i’m not up to scratch on developmental psychology and i don’t know what’s the latest status on the theory, that you’d pick a partner who is alike to your parents; specifically that men would pick a woman that is alike to their mother and vice versa for women. well, for straight men and women that is.
so anyone can fill me in on that, that would be great.

but considering that theory still holds true to some degree, i was wondering do gay men pick a partner who is more alike to the mother or the father? and vice versa for lesbian women?

i’m quite curious. does anyone know?

April 13th, 2012

Bible and Homosexuality

danishoutcast:

I just wish that the Church would read the WHOLE Bible.

Read More

all i’m saying is john19:26-27 and john13:23-25.

the beloved disciple declining at jesus’ bosom alright. 

well, let’s not over-analyse, but i think we can at least safely say, that jesus was very affectionate towards people, independent of their sex. 

certain people and religious groups nowadays would probably consider that to be “gay”. 

(via hurryupmerlin)

March 5th, 2012
although i would probably belong to that group, i find that kind of labelling rediculous. and i hope it will never ever make it to an official term.
seriously, the obsession with labeling anything sexual related is going too far.
for me, the excessive use of labels in sexual orientations actually tells me that people who use them are not open-minded as they like to claim, but quite the contrary. they can’t take someone just as they are, but need to create a box where they can put people in order to understand and accept them. that is not open-minded, that is shallow and dumb and simple. people are people and not categories!

although i would probably belong to that group, i find that kind of labelling rediculous. and i hope it will never ever make it to an official term.

seriously, the obsession with labeling anything sexual related is going too far.

for me, the excessive use of labels in sexual orientations actually tells me that people who use them are not open-minded as they like to claim, but quite the contrary. they can’t take someone just as they are, but need to create a box where they can put people in order to understand and accept them. that is not open-minded, that is shallow and dumb and simple.
people are people and not categories!

(via jim-in-london)

September 13th, 2011

cheattowin:

John Currin: … when you’re making a sculpture or image of a woman, is there a sexual aspect to it?

Tom Ford: … I’m very comfortable with naked bodies. Someone asked me recently about male nudity, and I brought up the subject that, in our culture, we use female nudity to sell everything. We’re…